USV's meeting on the 27/01/11 St Jory did not provide arguments to challenge our position.
By cons, their position is less clear, a spokesman who said FOR LGV but who hosts a meeting with stakeholders 100% AGAINST LGV !
Indeed, until firm Claraco which is largely out of its technical advisory role to question the legitimacy of the LGV , sending us their report as a reference. They themselves admit that: "this is not a study but a simple argument made quickly."
The guest star, Francois SIMON came from Europe by representing ecology (not the Regional Council), has used this platform to develop his ideas opposed LGV.
We thought attending a technical meeting and argued on the A62 zone, the impacts of D route and possible paths, we finally attended a meeting very political.
We have learned nothing.
Maybe one thing: faced with such a charade, and after all we've lived for over a year, in front of people able to snatch a microphone from the hands of a mayor whose town could be sacrificed on the altar policy, several possible attitudes:
- remain speechless, breathless with anger
- let him speak his feelings and indignation, with or without a microphone. I spent over a year since all my time to this cause. Day and night, on weekends. I let my heart speak, and leave the room, spontaneously, followed by several persons of the association.
A spontaneous movement, so unreasonable, but which finally was probably the most reasonable deal with players whose words could not appease us!
However, I regret very sincerely disruptions caused by isolated individuals who have meant an early termination of the meeting, which unfortunately does not at all to speak.
soon
CĂ©line Ferreira-Ducasse
President TGV Raisonné
0 comments:
Post a Comment