We have a user called " nonalalgv " leaving us comments on the blog and we want you to share these comments because we he always answered. As this blog is not ours but is yours you're part of this trade.
's what that says Nonalalgv :
nonalalgv added a new comment on your post "A precision "
I recorded what you say, but no real argument for the 3:07 concurencer the plane, it is these same figures presented by RFF showing Toulouse / Montauban 5min (a simple calculation shows a speed of 400km / h inconceivable) So totally distorted figures, knowing that station stops are not included in these 3H07min. Pollution is an argument totally unfounded if the construction works are numbered, and cleaner solutions for travel to Toulouse to Montauban example exists and are easy to implement. We now know that to use intelligent transportation it must match the needs of users, we can see the tram fiasco Toulouse. If all this had been calculated intelligently, can be an LGV up to Montauban and then an upgrade of the existing line was a smarter option.
response TGV REASON:
Well you go in all directions and if my argument does not convince you yours either.
figures RFF times are just attention.Toulouse Montauban is not 4 minutes!
you consider that the need to compete with aircraft on the Toulouse region is false?
Do you think the mode of transport of the future is the airplane?
Do you think the economy will slow down?
After making of a TGV to Montauban and after redevelopment tract it seems sensible yes.
But our energy hand it to fight a brand new layout on the A62.
0 comments:
Post a Comment