We were received by RFF to make an interim update on the situation.
following questions:
- Or are we on time validated?
late April assumptions plotted on the time validated D will be subject to consultation, studies evolve normally. (You will find these routes and areas identified sensitive by RFF on the blog or website GPSO).
We believe that the impact is so hard on St Rustice limited Pompignan on the tunnel, 5 houses on Castelnau, 3 on St Jory, 2 of Lespinasse.
- St Jory and Rue de Bagnols ?
Speaker: Jean Michel AUBELEAU is the Project Manager RFF Section St Jory Toulouse Narbonne
At our request Mr. Aubeleau talks about the last 4 tract of the existing line from St Jory in Toulouse, he does not speak of his project is another LGV but closely linked.
Its role is to find scenarios study on possible sailings north of Toulouse. The dynamism of the North does not stop at Toulouse St Jory it was planned to include in this scheme Castelnau changing modes of transportation. Amenities as the assumptions of existing lines will go up Castelnau. (The public debate began in June 2011).
This is actually the service from all the territories that we will address with the strengthening of ESTs, LGV is associated with this reflection because it will connect with the network already in place. Montauban example where the HSL will go to the Lot, Aveyron.
The redevelopment of the channels must be made to cities such as Montauban, Cahors, Brive.
We speak irrigation planning.
Speaking specifically of the street St Jory de Bagnols is well avoided, it is enough to hold the channel to avoid the houses. This was confirmed before the Prefect and the elected advisory board 26/01/2011.
So he assures us that the work is actually going in this direction.
He also informs us that cooperation is going well with Waterways of France that there is an exchange and a desire to find solutions for all the less impact. BNS is also now part of the Technical Committee (financers state, region).
However Mr Aubeleau must await the decision of the route LGV and six months since its projects are the idle which is very disadvantageous.
- St Jory you it will route the A62 in the village ?
Tiphaine Leclercq charge consultation GPSO can not go into details of the routes under consideration.
We recall that in an article in the Dispatch an expert at RFF was granted a loan of course spend lots of Autan, to Trinchet.
- Gare Sorting it not only loses its ability to function with the A62 route ?
D validated on the time there are many projects underway (all outstanding), there is a very important rail space and unexpected so near Toulouse, freight operators want it install, there would be a sort of base for Matabiau or place of maintenance.
With the A62 junction zone is extremely complicated and makes part of the station inoperative.
- And Lespinasse ?
Several solutions to the study, RFF admits that the junction is technically complicated and humane.
All proposed solutions all have major drawbacks.
- And Castelnau ?
Two solutions to the study without a tunnel (that means leveling of hills and overpasses ..) and tunnel current because the realization is complex here.
Accuracy personal: for a tunnel (and famous and frightening effect of a bomb at the entrance and exit to the existing tunnel Pompignan, we hear no more) will involve embankments as high as the level of the highway.
As for the land and moving their beds molassic diverse and varied, which moves in Pompignan also moves to Castelnau.
- Will there a decision as we asking in May at the ministerial point?
It seems there is a willingness to take a decision before the ministerial point of October.
RFF has no clear vision set by the Department.
received on 27/02/11 Mayors have requested that the decision comes and argued on the aberration of the zone A62. Hope that the Department wants out of the quagmire in which JL Borloo and UPS have set.
- When will we plotted assumptions?
Normally in April
- Is there a real time savings on the A62 time?
With 5 km from TGV line and more, so you can earn 1 to 2 minutes more. A condition to reach 230 km / h which does not seem clear on ... Lespinasse.
addition to 20 million (on average) KM LGV minute it is expensive (just 100 million), which already pays an extension study. ...
- UPS Has technical information that we would not ?
Absolutely not, everyone is level .
Except that when we ask for an appointment the Minister of Transport, politely by mail, contact the Prefecture we are still waiting.
spokesman for UPS was received on 17/02/11 by Thierry Mariani, perhaps through the intermediary of member Brigitte Bareges mayor of Montauban (nothing to do with our 15 km yet) that the accompanied it.
Mr Bussereau in June had received this same spokesperson.
To believe that equal treatment of all citizens is difficult to honor, we will go to Paris and encamp before the department that we have not happening right?
CONCLUSION
Again, we do not work in the political field, we have no private interests by acting against us for the collective interest, the interest of citizens and therefore we do not need to make up the numbers, nor to advance false studies to try to defend the indefensible. We relied only on tangible and verifiable, objective evidence, we do not need fireworks, we do not need to use pseudo facto research firm, we do not need to beg door policy, they come on their own to us.
calculations, we do not do, we do not need to assess the minute the acceleration of the TGV to understand that those who make decisions do not stick only factors to mathematics but also to human factors but also financial. Why try to spend more while the project time savings D public spending?
encounter with RFF has enabled us to understand that we were right, we had made the right choice in favoring the construction of this line LGV validated the time to know the time D.
