Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Best Red Dot For Money

Great trip! Chronic

To allow me more freedom, I decided to migrate this blog. I wanted to have a more flexible platform allowing me to integrate such photographs. This explains the radio silence the last few weeks. You will find the revamped version, there .
Be lenient, I still have some work to do!

Monday, August 2, 2010

Honey Honey Drops Raw

City

Chronic City, Jonathan Lethem, is not a novel of September 11, 2001. While the novel is set in a New York of the new millennium, and his characters explore the city, from the Upper East Side to Lower Manhattan's Town Hall. At no when the author mentions that day, nor even its salient features: no fire, no plane, no tower are discussed in this novel. Yet there is something going on in the literature of 11 September with Chronic City. Maybe this is the result of reader who seeks in the New York novel traces the 2001 attacks. Already, with Let the Great World Spin , Colum McCann explored the figure of the tightrope walker Philippe Petit, famously walked between the two rounds in 1974, directing the gaze towards the towers building on the nostalgia of an era over, one where the talk does not amount to talk about their destruction. Chronic City becomes a novel about him specifically by the September 11 detours it takes not to name September 11, to circumvent the figures.

Forget the main character, Chase Insteadman, whose name (Man instead of ...) the place from the outset in the strange transitional space that is his life surrounded by marijuana smoke and the real almost alternating built by the character of Perkus Tooth. Which, in Lethem's work evokes September 11, these are indications of a threat and the underground days of gray fog.

The New York Chronic City is grappling with a monster, described as an animal such as the legendary yeti, whose alleged apparitions are surprised by witnesses hallucinating. Because we must name the enemy, journalists and witnesses they decide is a tiger, bringing the ongoing destruction of an enemy known. "[...] Biller INSTEAD logged on to the City's Tiger Watch Web Site. The last monster HAD Been seen Two days ago, we Sixty-Eighth Street by a couple of undergraduates Hunter, Beneath rustling year Opened metal grating at a work site. There HAD Been No Casualties or damage, & the site ranked Risk Of An attack tonight as Yellow, or Low-to-Moderate " (P. 226).
The tiger is actually a machine that was digging a new subway line and that has apparently packed, developing its own "intelligence" and exceeding the levels of its operators. A kind of Frankenstein, in short, that strikes at any time (but especially at night) and, especially, causes evacuation (and conviction) of apartment buildings. Coming from below, the threat that is the tiger eventually make its own revitalization. But two features of this threat are interesting. On the one hand, it is, like terrorism, unpredictable: the machine does not hit in a logical, linear. It is surprising, moving, processing power. As the great figure of the post-September 11, Osama bin Laden, the tiger is watched, you imagine seeing the stalk, and its appearances change the alert level. On the other hand, machine, mythologized, driven both by witnesses as journalists, forced to accept changes that, in fact, is not so much coincidence that political considerations and planning. If there Lethem in a reflection on September 11, she may find here in a critical discourse of fear and security which led a majority of Americans not only accept restrictions in their freedom and individual rights but to wish for. The transformation of a machine of "mass destruction" in tiger gives a face "acceptable", is a process of infantilization witnesses: you do not see what you see, you see what we tell you that you see ... Chronic

If City does not mention September 11, or even the World Trade Center, the novel is built, however, according to a geometry with two poles: on the one hand, the fascination and fear of the tiger, the other, mist that floated over the city over a hole. Mentioned several times, This hole, located only vaguely as belonging to the "lower part of the Island" (p. 173), is associated with a gray mist ("gray fog") and a vague threat but constant. The hole, never named, never otherwise determined by the fog, is a sort of No Man's Land, dangerous dirt: "I Realized I Had not Been So Far Since The downtown gray fog's onset" (p. 233). Both the machine is, by its association with a tiger, custom designed, as the fog appears as an event without a date, without beginning, without end, but without apparent cause. The towers are not in Chronic City, destroyed. They are only from the fog, invisible, "Philippe Petit crossing impossible That distance of sky Between the towers, now unseen for months So Many behind-the gray fog" (p. 430), as if, should the lifting of the fog, they resurface. As with

Let the Great World Spin where the figure of Philippe Petit is used to mark the distance between the two towers, between the glorious past of their construction and their sudden absence, days of fog in the novel Lethem make visible a break in the life of the city between the before and after. But Lethem goes beyond mere temporal break. As le fait en mettant en scène le tigre, Lethem utilise le brouillard pour critiquer l’après-11 septembre : « Something happened, Chase, there was some rupture in this city. Since then, time’s been fragmented. Might have to do with the gray fog, that or some other disaster. Whatever the cause, ever since we’ve been living in a place that’s a replica of itself, a fragile simulacrum, full of gasps and glitches. A theme park, really! Meant to halt time’s encroachment. Of course such a thing is destined always to fail, time has a way of getting its bills paid. » (p. 389) La critique de Lethem ne se porte pas sur l’avant-11 septembre. Certes, un changement a eu lieu, dit le personnage, Perkus Tooth, but since September 11 that "we live in a world that is a simulacrum, a replica of himself. A theme park for fun, to put people to sleep, to prevent them from seeing what is really happening, the changes under way, impossible to counter. If Lethem has in this passage, a pessimistic view, it is not so much because he fears the return of terrorism, but because you can tweak endlessly with reality, it always ends up catching us up and ask her due. Perkus Tooth kind of seeing hallucinations (drugged and immersed in his own fog, that of marijuana), thus becomes a Cassandra, announcing the end of fear is not that we believe that, disguised, camouflaged supposedly for our protection, it will do no less and will be worse than the first disaster this "break in the city."

As surely, therefore, that Lynne Sharon Schwartz and Don DeLillo, attacking head-on attacks, wrote novels that are part of the literature on 11 September, Lethem is another vision of this new literature is accessed: the event has more to be named, it is in the background, and flat over the town, as the smell of chocolate, sweet, reminiscent of the smell of corpses floating in the city for weeks after the attacks. In rusant with the figures of the event, using them as leverage tacit Lethem built a critique of the mythologizing of September 11 and its aftermath. There would thus be a memory of Sept. 11, sponsored New York may be the best custodians.

Wednesday, June 23, 2010

How To Obtain Spirit Wolf?

Fiction truth, truth from fiction

I invite you to read on the site of Salon Double reflection that launched the Words Written in Dust.

Here's a short excerpt:
men and women went to work. That is the point departure. The moment before everything changed. That is where part or expected from the narrative. Perhaps a name: Paul, John, Jane, Leah. The color of their full or their tailor. The weight of the briefcase. The control of coffee in the little bistro at the subway exit. The casual conversations around the lunch, or silence. Everyday actions, shaving cream, deodorant, shirt, socks. The closed face changer in the subway, his story. But writing these details, that would be something appropriate. The difficulty of telling, however, prefers not to name, did not specify. Perhaps because, from when it comes to telling it these events, it is inevitable to encounter this feeling: no matter what I write, basically. No matter how I say, with what word, I will describe how these lives, these moments, these moments. My reader will know, without my saying that my characters, if that is really are doomed. He will know that if I say that the sun shines, it will be to mark the contrast with what is coming.

To read the full article, click here .

Friday, May 28, 2010

Instructions For Frontier Junction

The Twins

The city was quiet, at least as quiet as it was weekday Could Be, With The cabs fighting the cars fighting the buses fighting the bikes and the pedestrians and the dogs and the kids on their way across town on 6th avenue . As I sat in the coffee shop, slowly calming myself, my hands wrapped around a bowl of latte, I savored this return to normalcy. The vacation was finally over, I had left the twins at school and somehow managed to tear myself away from them in record time.

It was their first day of first grade. At six years old, they were still full of fears, and as I had attempted to leave them to the care of Mrs. Paul, had clung to me as if I were the last lifejacket on the Titanic. This was not new: when faced with a new experience, they revealed themselves as clinging, crying babies who didn’t seem to trust me when I repeatedly told them I would be back in seven hours. Even though, from the moment of their birth, I had never been late! To people who told me, while I was pregnant, that twins were good because they relied on each other for comfort, I could oppose this ever-repeated image of me having to physically pry myself away from two 35-pound girls whenever I wanted to go to the bathroom.

I had tried everything, read all the books I could find. When they were 4, after I realized I could teach a class on fear of abandonment but could not reassure my own children, I even consulted a child psychiatrist who, after meeting them, simply told me that the twins would outgrow their insecurities when they had “sufficient experience” of me returning when I had said I would. I asked, What is sufficient? He shrugged. I didn’t like the shrug. I resented it. I thought a doctor would have something to offer, tips, exercises. I was willing to accept any blame coming my way to explain my children’s behavior. Maybe I ate too much fish while pregnant. Or didn’t drink enough water. Or didn’t sing enough songs while they were infants. He shrugged again, simply suggesting that my children may have suffered a small trauma while in the womb. Or they were experiencing vicarious trauma, for something I had not properly dealt with in my own life. I could think of no such thing. Nothing “significant” enough to explain why two 4-year olds needed to be hand-held for every single activity, even when their play dates couldn’t run fast enough from their own parents.

I left the doctor’s office none the wiser and attempted to weather the storms.

I had now lived through 6 years of this dictatorial regime, condemned to pee with a child on my lap, to sleep knowing that the smallest noise, even a snore, could unleash the two-head monster that had bunk beds in the other room, 6 years during which I scarcely had a moment to myself because no babysitter would come twice. After going through an alarming number of undergrad students to look after my girls, I realized quickly that the babysitters had even started speaking among themselves and none would dare answer to my calls for help. So after all this time, I had come to the realization that nothing I could do to make my children feel safe and secure would be enough. I would, always, come short. Always, or until they had, how did the good doctor put it, “had sufficient experience” of my faithfulness to my word. I still stayed with the babysitter until the girls were starting to wander around the room. I still worried about what I would find when I returned, or the report I would get from whomever was in charge. But I had, somewhat, come to terms with my failings, and understood that it would take time. And that the best I could do was, aside from being a good mother, to make sure that no adult left with my girls suffered too much. So this morning, the fact that it took me only 20 minutes to settle the girls well enough for me not to feel guilty for leaving them with their teacher made me feel like celebrating. It was getting better. All summer I had seen small improvements, brief moments when the girls forgot to be scared and enjoyed themselves.

I entered a coffee shop and sat down with the students and the artists working at the other tables. I could not do this often; it implied having free time, which had become scarce since Chuck had left us. That lack of time, or relief, was the only downside to our separation. Ever since we had found out that I was expecting twins, Chuck had been an asshole, as if that extra baby that Mr. Planning could not foresee had pushed him back into his adolescence. He left after their first birthday party, simply telling me it — meaning the kids, the noise, the lack of downtime, the burden of responsibilities —would only get worse.

As I sat drinking my coffee and eating a pastry, I smiled at the private joke: it was finally getting better, and I alone would get to enjoy it! Chuck had decided to see the girls only in family gatherings, where he could dump the care of our daughters on his mother, sisters, sister-in-laws; even his brothers where better at this than him. I had his guilty conscience to thank for the fact that he paid, however, his child-support like clockwork, and very generously, I might add, and did not want to formalize our separation by a divorce until either one of us needed it. It was, therefore, the best of both worlds: I didn’t have to move or find cheaper babysitters, and he was free of the care of our children. Free moments, like now, were nevertheless few and far between. Soon, I would have to go back to work. But, I still had an hour.

It didn’t happen suddenly. A murmur started in the coffee shop, and it took a while for it to become strong enough to reach me. A young man stood up, and said in a shaking voice that the World Trade Center had been hit by what was believed to be a plane. I asked him what kind of plane. Where on the tower. Which tower. He didn’t know. He knew nothing, in fact, aside from the small fact that an object hit a tower on a day where you could see for miles. In the back of my mind, I figured either it was a joke, or it was not an accident. A joke, in this oh-so-politically-correct time, seemed unlikely. An accident would have made much more sense had it involved one of those tourist planes over the many midtown buildings concentrated on a small block. Or way downtown, close to Wall Street, in those old streets. But… but no, there was no way that a pilot could forget or lose track of the towers. Not those big monsters. I left $10 on the table, took my bag and left.

I made my way onto the street. There was a hush on the corner of 12 th street and 6 th avenue, even with the screeching of the fire and rescue trucks going downtown. I stood on 6 th , looking at the smoke pouring from the tower. I could not see much, I mean aside from the smoke, and the faces of the other onlookers as we stood there. Around me, there were a few cries, and yet most of us where mostly curious. A plane, there. Why not crash in the river, instead, if a crash was inevitable? I started walking down 6 th , planning to get closer, to get a better view. Somewhere around 4 th street, the vibrations of a sound above me made me, instinctively, crouch. It happened fast, too fast for me to even register it, as if the sound and the vibrations had lingered in me longer to allow me to associate them with the sudden explosion of reds and blacks and white feathery papers that filled the sky.

Now I knew. I knew it could not have been an accident. And I was not alone in the understanding: all around me, the chattering that had united dozens of bystanders stopped and was replaced by a cry, a gasp, and a few curse words. My mind was blank, still inhabited by the vibrations and sounds and papers, still filled with the sudden knowledge that something had shifted, some quiet balance that had kept the world at bay and protected us from the bombs of the others. It had not been peace. Nor had it been, after all, our might. It had, only, been a truce.

I started backing up, unwilling to look anywhere else, yet aware, deep in my mind, that getting away from the buildings could possibly be something along the lines of sanity. I kept bumping on people who merely mumbled instead of the rude words I would have normally received, had I attempted this delicate maneuver on any other day. People were sobbing now, frantically dialing on their cell phones, pointing at the towers. The voices were coming back, hitting higher notes, as the people related to newcomers what had happened. I could not see their faces, as I walked backwards, yet I envied the new guys: they didn’t know. They could still live in that time before the end of the truce, they could still delay the realization. We couldn’t. We, the people who saw, could not tear our collective gaze from the smoking guns ahead of us. I suspected that the images had been seared onto our retinas.

Suddenly, as I was expecting something else to happen, I thought of the girls. I had forgotten them, for a few minutes, and it appeared like an unforgiveable act. If my going to the bathroom scared them, what would this do to them? I turned away from the towers and started running, my bag hitting the crush of people still gathering on the street corners, my mind suddenly filled with one thought: getting to my kids before… I didn’t know before what. I couldn’t finish the thought. Something else, something even worse could happen, would happen, was happening, right now, and I had been stupid enough to attempt to get closer to the buildings, forgetting I had responsibilities, two lovely, so lovely girls.

I saw the streets run by me, 7 th , 8 th , 9 th , 10 th , and finally found myself in front of the school. I was not alone there. Parents where arriving from every direction, talking nervously to one another. Most had been on the subway when it happened, or making their way towards their desks. A few, like me, had seen it from a street corner. Others had just arrived at the school with their excited children, expecting a normal day, protected, by some magical enchantment, from the knowledge that united all the others. I didn’t know these people. My kids were only starting first grade, so I had not made many friends among the parents. Yet, as we stood waiting by the doors for our sons and daughters, knowledge created a bond, however fraught by the differences in understanding and witnessing of something that lacked, at least for now, a distinct meaning. We didn’t know, aside from the little that we knew and could fit in one sentence (two planes hit the towers of the World Trade Center), what it all meant. Was it over? What was happening, high in the towers?

I had left the girls at school less than an hour ago. During that hour, I had seen planes and papers doing things that made no sense. All I wanted was to hold my kids, and promise that I would never leave them to deal alone with all that. I expected them to be scared, troubled, even traumatized by the sounds of the explosions and the sudden change in their routine caused by my arrival at school around 9:30. I expected them to punish me, in a way, for that. I expected them to cling even closer to me now, and it made sense, after all. I suddenly welcomed it. I may have been 36, but if my mother were alive, I would hide on her lap, with her hand stroking my hair, the other one on the small of my back, her voice soothingly telling me that everything would be ok, that we were safe. I wished my mom was still there, because she would have taken us in, my daughters and me, and hugged us until the images of the plane being swallowed by the tower receded from my burnt eyes.

But I was the mother now. So I walked into the school, and stood in front of Mrs. Pauls’ first grade class, expecting to witness some unrest in the classroom. Surely, they had heard. Or at least felt the turmoil that was taking the city. Yet, all 25 kids were sitting in a circle, listening to Mrs. Pauls read a story. Julianne and Katherine were not even side-by-side. Katherine was giggling in the ear of some blond little girl, while Julianne, sitting between a redheaded boy and a sturdy girl, had a serious frown on her face. Mrs. Pauls stood up when she saw me in the doorway. She walked towards me, and though my girls saw me, they didn’t move an inch, simply looking at each other. She asked if I was sure I wanted to “disrupt” the children. As if my coming there to rescue my kids and bring them to safety was more disruptive than what was going on downtown! I was gearing myself for an argument when we heard some yelling. Mrs. Pauls, ever so stoic, walked slowly in the hallway, towards the sound. The principal was standing in front of a TV screen, his hands on his mouth. He turned to face us, and simply said “It’s gone”. What could be gone? “The tower, the other tower. It disappeared.”

As if what I had seen so far made sense, this new level of impossibility struck me to my knees. Where could it have gone? I looked at the images, attempting to decipher the dust and the cloud of debris. Surely, something would be left, at least half of the tower, the one half that wasn’t touched by fire. Mrs Pauls had put her hand on my shoulder. Quietly. If that tower can go, she murmured, then the other one will too. You can’t leave. The children can’t leave.

And so we waited. I sat in the girls’ classroom, watching them listening to Mrs. Pauls’ stories, Katherine and Julianne, giggling girls who now looked nothing like the crying babies I had left 2 hours before. They didn’t even come to sit with me; they stayed in their place, Katherine beside the blond girl, Julianne with the redheaded boy. Until the parents of the other children came, we stayed. And then, around 2 or 3 in the afternoon, when it became somewhat clear that the worst was over, we left. The twins asked for ice cream: it smelled too bad to eat outside, so we bought it and walked home. There, they ran to their room, unfazed by the sounds and smells, and left me alone in the living room. I offered to read them a story, to play with them. I asked if they needed to talk about their day. They shrugged.

They didn’t even realize it when I stepped outside, on the landing, to discuss the day with the neighbors.

Monday, May 24, 2010

What Does It Mean Doctor Says Cervix Hard Three

A question of structure pairs

Depuis quelque temps, un peu avant que Ginny ne rencontre Leah dans l'escalier de la tour nord, I wonder if my news is not anything but new. If there is not something like a broader narrative. I will not say a novel, I would have had to think about before. But ... But I do not know. In the case of several of the most recent texts, I feel that the text stops, he needs a break, he needed me to move on to another character before returning to him. I realize that not necessarily all come together, my characters are interwoven into something broader.

Then I begin to dream to be able to draw them into the towers, place them physically able to tell them, give them landmarks, a chronology. As if to tell Sept. 11, he had to give an outlet to time.

Monday, May 17, 2010

How Many Points In A Chow Mein



I reread the manuscript, and realize that almost all the characters come in pairs, while in Around them, my characters were alone. These latter characters are also, after all, can it be otherwise only the face of death? But what intrigues me is to realize that to write on September 11, I went through the relationships of the characters with those who remain.

Thus, Ginny, alone in the staircase, crossed without encountering Leah, and Leah, in turn, is transformed by the determination Ginny gives him the courage she refuses. Phil is in the collection because his brother, seeks not to abandon it in the rubble. Eileen, facing his own death, sees no other option but to contact her loved ones, and failing to join her children and her husband, she calls her father. Do not think that my characters have their relationships changed by the specter of death. This is not what it is.

In fact, I do not know what it is. Maybe it is just another evolution of my writing. Perhaps it is only the subject that calls it. Maybe he would have been too heavy, too daunting, having only about twenty people, completely alone at the time of dying or suffering.

I know this, for cons: I write maybe not so much the story of 11 September that the story of characters, the story of Danny and his brother, the story of Melanie forced to explain to her son that his dad will not return, the story of Leah who wants to die and survive. Not so much history, as the characters.

Poor certainty.

Wednesday, May 5, 2010

How Do You Get Purple Highlights

What are the conspiracy theories?

David Ray Griffin was at UQAM on Monday night. High priest of the movement of "truthers", it is came to give us his reading of the facts. And the important word is "reading". I was troubled by the crowds who lined up to enter the auditorium. All these people, this kind of talk? Disappointment, then. I thought we were less gullible ...

I was intrigued at one time by conspiracy theories, I confess. The movie Loose Change has cast doubt on me through his argumentative construction. Loose Change, Griffin and others (Meyssan, for example) have the advantage of offering an attractive version of the attacks which, by contradicting the official version alleging the failure of security services, emergency workers, buildings Similarly, just say that everything was planned in advance, and not only expected, but planned by the figures of power internally. In other words, instead of having to accept the unthinkable, that nobody could protect them, even their government, truthers decide to believe in a version where the enemy is within, so identifiable. "The belief in unreal things helps us to withstand real life," said Nancy Huston about faith in The myth-making species.

Conspiracy theories function as drawings issue of our childhood: they organize, link to odd facts reveal a drawing / hidden agenda. They abolish chance, fate, chaos, saying: look, here, here, here, see how everything can make sense if you accept see the truth. Much Chossudovski who presented the speakers that have hammered Griffin that "the facts were undeniable," that science was right. The towers of the World Trade Center would not have collapsed without the intervention of explosives. Witnesses heard explosions. They say that, we see that repeating, science, science my friends, you see that you can not deny the truth. But they neglect speak equally undeniable fact: preparing buildings for implosion takes months. Months during which workers would have placed explosives cons columns. How to do that while 45,000 people visit the tower every day? And explosives were triggered when the first explosion, when the planes hit the towers. But then, one hears almost suggest the explosives were installed after aircraft. In 102 minutes, so, much less for the south tower? Difficult from a scientific perspective, to accept that possibility. Ok, ok, could they admit. But the explosions? Want meeting that the fire example reservoirs that fed generators, power sources? Ok, ok, but then the "puff" of smoke, when the towers collapsed? You mean the very strength of the collapse, which has packed the 110-story towers in 7 floors of debris, then compressed to both the content of the towers and air?

I do not deny the fact that the U.S. took advantage of the attacks to accept an increase in defense costs, a reduction of rights by the Patriot Act or even that they have used the attacks as mantra to control the population. But after the fact. Yes, it has served their interests. But how could they plan that? Such planning would have meant that several thousand people in government as in the security services and military services, were aware of the attacks. In a city like Washington, in the words I do not know how involved, secrets are impossible because everyone immediately ran to the media to be the person who revealed the scoop? Anyway!

Conspiracy theories come into play when a) the explanation weakens the perception of a people, leading to insecurity; b) explanation does not tell all, as in this case, either by fear of consequences, either because the information is missing, either because it overstated given the magnitude of an event. Conspiracy theories play the same role, in fact, that religion and the founding myths: because humans do not understand how the earth had been created, because he needed to affix a meaning and a story to facts that exceeded, he invented a story. Whenever the human fear, suffering, he invents a meaning that transcends fear and pain: karma, destiny, fate. "All of this actually help people to live, to endure the pain of loss, to grieve, to renew their energies for the next day, "Huston writes. That does not mean that Jesus was born of immaculate conception, nor Moses separated the waters.

Religion, like conspiracy theories, is a narrative. This story, it behooves us to interpret, to consider it as a narrative and not as truth. And we returns, also, be wary when agitated propaganda and instead offer us an explanation, prompts us to cry in front of the facts it presents as "undeniable." The only thing that is undeniable when it comes to September 11, 2001, is that the World Trade Center no longer exist, and resulted in the deaths of thousands of people. Everything else can be reinterpreted.

I went to see Griffin out of curiosity, but also because I felt I had to. I explained before the conference, my "theory", my reading of conspiracy theories as foundational narrative, replacing god to understand the incomprehensible. I struggled throughout the conference not to scream, to deconstruct As Griffin's speech, adding other given what he said. I did not know, have only just discovered, that Griffin, a retired professor of theology, taught until 2005 in a very religious university, and in a department whose primary function is to train future priests. I do not know, but have nonetheless acknowledged in his speech. He speaks well, Griffin. He has a real talent as an orator, he is convincing. That does not mean that his world view, separate between true and false, good and evil, holds up.


Thursday, April 29, 2010

Names For The College Annual Fest

Americanity

* I repeat here the text delivered at the Roundtable "American Writing" organized by Andree A. Michaud, 24 February 2009.

I was born September 11, 2001, back welded to a futon orange, feet on the ground to keep from fleeing. I woke before the images appear on-screen aircraft interlocking towers. Until this morning I can not rid myself, I had had before the world and the political attitude of the pampered child who believes the world is going on outside, away from her. I was not so young, however, which means I had no excuse. But I never really felt involved, affected by what I saw on the news. The collapse of the World Trade Center had good happen to hundreds of miles from home, I could no longer shrug and say that this does not affect me. The American continent was shrinking, while the cooled coffee into the cup that I had forgotten in my hand.

I never thought my writing in terms of Americanness. Maybe because I have never, or so little then, thought the literature under the auspices of a national body, but according to the authors within me or with me for a while. I do know that I was more in common with Russian literature than the French. And until I am able to read American novels in English, I knew that some of this literature, authors like Paul Auster, whose translations by Christine LeBoeuf made me shudder as I recognized that she knew nothing the North American reality. As to what the North American reality could well be, I was not persuaded to offer a response that is yours.

I think what has changed, Sept. 11, initially only not affected my relationship with writing, but my relationship with the world. I saw the same TV images that the Americans. I heard the same stories. I had, in fact, access the same information that the residents of the United States not located directly in the city of New York. And what I saw opened my eyes, making me doubt things taken for granted for so long: security, everyday buildings. In collapsing towers, revealed to me how the view of the protected western that I was insecure. I could not, in fact, act as if this was happening for example in the Middle East could affect me.

By changing the look I was asking about the world, it is inevitable that the events of September 2001 also change my writing. I did not put in writing immediately around events, it would take me years to get there. But I started thinking about my relationship with writing and literature based either on the language in which I wrote and read the French, but according to membership of a continent, America. Not that I develop in my writing detailed thinking about the question: I am simply conscious of living in America, my relationship with the world, landscape, space, politics itself is a U.S. report.

The question, doubt, anxiety, is becoming more Americans than North America. After all, I spend so much time now to read in English that I find myself starting News in English, and having to make a conscious effort to repeat in French. I do not know where that can take me. I only know that if France continued to exert a certain appeal, I can not deny that my eyes now turn to America. Maybe I'm the result of this cultural bombardment came from our neighbors to the south: television, news, literature, cinema. Or maybe all this is it the result of a simple proximity between the two nations were born almost simultaneously, and having been built on a relatively short period.

I know define myself first as an American, in the sense of belonging mainland, appears to some as an abandonment of the real identity of Quebec. After all, my growing attachment to literature, culture and the English language is it not about to cause my assimilation, this same fight against which Quebec? Yet it seems to me that what Americanness means, for me at least, this is the principle of a meeting: cultures and microcultures Quebec, Canadian, Americans, Native American and Mexican feeding off one another and freeing a commitment to "filial" with Europe. This filial attachment is not bad if it allows us to recognize some of our roots. But he can not prevent us from recognizing that the continent on which we built has its own story, a story we have partly created, partly inherited from its first inhabitants, transformed and adapted in part from what we have brought with us from Europe. And I thought, at least at this moment, be inhabited by a culture and literature U.S., the fact remains that I keep a certain distance before them, the one that gives me my position of Quebec. I therefore different states Americanness and unity, since they have no monopoly on this continent. In sum, it is perhaps less for me to define my relationship with Americanness in exclusive terms, to place America, Quebec, Canada, the United States, France, etc.. In opposition and more see my relationship with the world through the points of encounter between different worlds. I am, after all, the generation that has seen the world shrink over the web. It is therefore perhaps not surprising that I do not feel the need to define myself according one identity, one belonging.

I was born September 11, I said at the beginning. Not that this event has imported more than others in the history of mankind. But it's probably because it is only today that I realized that I was part of that humanity, especially when I realized that this plaque, which I found somewhere on the Atlantic Ocean, was neither too large nor too small it might seem at first sight.

Saturday, April 24, 2010

Brownies In Different Countries

The truth? (2)

If the mass of facts hangs over the events of September 11, 2001, also because they seem inevitable. I will not repeat here the journey of these figures. I only say this: write 11 September 2001, perhaps it is primarily to provide a space through the facts, for they are undeniable, the veil event. Also at Blue Metropolis, Marc Zaffran, alias Martin Winkler explained that all the medical facts of his various novels were fair, verifiable. It was important for him that fiction is not, in short, an opportunity to misinform. So he gave a role to fiction, a "mission".

A friend of mine, very good indeed, wrote a novel about Sept. 11, because force him to talk, I ended up infected. This is great news, very solid, with an interesting character. Except that. Except that it plays with reality, with what would be the situation at the top of the north tower, at the restaurant Windows on the World.

How much room do we have the facts? Certainly, they must move, transform, adapt, short, cross through writing. But before a real event, history, how far can we go? My friend said precisely, we can do everything. And normally I would agree. Normally, that is, for anything that does not concern September 11, 2001. This project, in which I joined three years ago. That fiction can not help but invent what happened behind the shiny facade of the towers, there's no doubt. My problem is elsewhere: the facts, data, dates, times, I can not circumvent, avoid, in short, I can not deny them. They are there. To write my September 11, one of my characters is a space out of those facts that I have to spare. And I think this is so, being as just as possible as "real" as possible, that I will be able to write around this event. I am not a historical novel, but to write, I need to know that this thing under and the changing face (sometimes short stories, sometimes pulling the novel) can not be contested on its facts: everything else, yes. But the facts, the likelihood that my characters could have existed, even if they are completely invented, no. No one has survived up to the point of impact in the north tower. At the restaurant Windows on the World, heat, smoke was suffocating. To the 78th floor of the south tower, the survival impact of the second aircraft was not impossible but rare.

I have of the event that facts scattered images seen on television, photographs, stories heard. To rebuild it, give it meaning, I fill the gaping spaces left between these facts. I am not a history book, I remember. But if I do not believe that my book has a "mission", it seems he can not lie. He can not divert the facts. Everything else, yes, the rest is the image we wanted to give the event, its crystallization in the figures (the hero, the victim, the good, the bad guy). Freedom to write September 11, she comes from a search of reality for me based not on an abandonment of truthfulness, but on a negotiation with reality: Can I convert, I have to accept.

Crisco For Moisturizer

The truth? (1) Peter and Eva

I often think back to my brother's accident. The facts are indisputable: a man alone in his car on a Wednesday evening, deviates slightly from its route, a few miles from his home and finds himself in the path of a truck he can not avoid. The force of impact does not forgive. The truck ends up in a cornfield, the man's car is destroyed. Those are the facts. I was fine try to understand the incomprehensible, I could not know with certainty what had happened for a good driver as my brother found where he was. All explanations have remained in the air even more difficult to consider that those quick to deconstruct because they are too afraid. I do not believe in suicide as an option, I will say right now: my brother was much too specific, determined to risk to fail, to survive, or to intentionally hurt someone. But he got sick? The winds were strong it seems, that evening. His jeep he was deported by a flurry came from the fields? And if the cause was a mere moment of inattention, as every driver has at one time or another, like my brother might have been very often during his twenty years of driving? I do not know.
After his death, accompanying the reason for which I had no answer, because the one who could explain what had happened could no longer respond, I asked how. Medically. Almost coldly. No, not cold, it's not true. Instead, methodically: I wanted to understand how the body of this man that I loved so much had been abandoned. My brother, when he was small, always said "want to see." I think about it, here now and realize that if he wanted to see me, I wanted to understand. So when I have not heard from my brother that the memories of the night he died, the shock of seeing him there, still, I wanted to understand the mechanics of his body, his wounds, to reach, difficult to admit that my older brother had no chance, and that had he survived, it would have been a way he would have rejected outright.
What remains there after the death of a loved one? Facts subside at some point. They are there, they still veiled, but there comes a time when to understand, to grasp this new reality, we must look at things differently, to reconstruct a narrative of the event which will incorporate these facts in the best case, but that will fill the spaces that the facts do not explain. And ultimately, here, now that my brother had felt unwell, he forgot to look before him, he was killed by a burst of anger or looking for a phone, do not change much to the fact that he is gone. Why, how, do not repair anything.
I do not write the death of my brother, yes. Or rather, I have written every day since October 25, 2006, for me to understand, to not accept it but live with it, learn to see beyond it and find my brother, my family life. (I know it's cheesy ...? Make way ...)
James Frey at Blue Metropolis, insisted today that the facts and truth are two. It is not wrong: the facts may be immutable, they are fragmented: they trace the portrait of an event can only be pierced. Telling it fill those holes, it adjust the facts to reach a truth (of the experiment, the subject of the current text) for the real drama of this, whether the death of my brother or September 11, become the reality of the character of the novel, new.

Thursday, April 22, 2010

Infected Lip Piercing Hard Lump



It would, for they understand, that his portrait is as true as possible, he would like to say that she was still crying after. That was what had attracted more than his eyes, more than passion waving his hands over his body swimmer although she hated the smell of public pools. After love, she was crying, quiet tears, on either side of her cheeks, at the end outside of his eyes. He was worried the first time, then he realized that it was at that time, when the tears flowed, she enjoyed.


He had known several women during his adult life, women sometimes feel the need to support their orgasm noises, sounds and words, and spent his early years when he needed evidence to suggest adequate fit to give pleasure, he began to distrust noisy. It was so easy, even Peter had to pretend he began to look for other signs in its partners, more discreet signs. The tremor in one hand behind his back. A sound in the back of the throat. Eyelid opening suddenly. Peter loved to follow the rise and the enjoyment of women he met, but some feared the watchful eyes at a time when they would have desired so absorbed in their bodies than their eyes were lover disturb something.


Their first night could be described as an error. A flirt lift too much alcohol. A bed. Peter and Eva. The mess of clothes thrown behind them as they staggered into the room. The cavalcade of hands, heads may face, moving an arm, a leg, to make room for this other thing, this sudden movement unified. A cry, no, not a cry, a sound came from the bottom of the gorge of Eva, and a deeper panting Peter. Sounds as indistinct as their movements. As concentrated as the sensations.


But it was only after things started, after that first night Peter did not notice anything special about Eva, and Eva did that when she had to do, felt what she felt, and went home at dawn with the number of Peter on his Palm Pilot.


He tells it this way, the handrail on the hot metal banister. Here are some stories now that the feet are struggling in the water coming from sprinklers, as useless as a small tea cup to bail the Titanic. He knows that, while he advances, he knows without seeing something that thousands of sheets of paper flying from the top of Tower, confetti for a Tuesday party.


Eva cried. A tear on either side of her face. He knew how she enjoyed. He repeats that he, Peter Thornbridge, 38, as if a foretaste, he kept it alive, it stayed alive. Steps, one after another, the surf on water levels, the sweat on his back and his hand, the heat of the stairwell. With the enjoyment of Eva, small, very small details that prevent it from shaking down ant, wise and row, while his whole body cried out that he must, out now, without delay. Time is not waiting, and yet that is all Peter is now for 49 minutes.


When stops to let another company of firefighters, Peter reads the safety of a fire extinguisher. As if the prospect of fire eating his body, the average man with the concentration required to integrate the rules for using a fire extinguisher. To measure the distance between itself and fire, aim correctly, press the trigger. Peter asked about the number of fire extinguishers in the tower and wondered if anyone up there, working to attack the fire. He begins to descend.


Strange is not it, in a city like New York where, at rush hour, do not hesitate to push to enter the subway, while that to gain a few minutes to arrive earlier at their destination, strange that someone somewhere expects that thousands of people use the stairwells in a calm way and asked. Apparently yes, if it believes the relative calm with which the feet follow the flow of water now continuous sweeping. One step at a time. Politely. Wisely. A little more, and they would take all by the hand, two by two, singing songs from school.


Saturday, April 17, 2010

How To Adjust Windage And Elevation On A Scope

The impossible encounter

I constantly stress to students: Be generous with your characters, do not let them down. Accompany them, instead of judging them. I know it may be almost anything, from rhetoric to gain acceptance to aspiring writers need to treat well its characters, write correctly, not on the page garrocha hoping that the reader can follow. My students often resist: bin there, ma'am, it just happened! Maybe. Maybe. But I was not there. Your player was not there. Then reinvent them, instead of trying to transpose.

past year, I is not moving as briskly in the compendium. Of course, there is the lack of time, writing articles, giving courses, work, seminars, life. But it's not just that. I have not finished writing Bob and Helen because I do not know yet what will happen to them. Because Helen is the 78th floor of the south tower, and frankly it is not a good place to be on the morning of September 11. So I can not write it slightly. It focuses on these little beasts, as I often say. It focuses on those we create. Then he drives us as a conscience, which we do not want them to suffer unnecessarily.

The good characters, "I sometimes tell my students, they stay a while. You see them, we hear them. They exist. Some do not leave us, as James, the first collection, perhaps because I have not finished to write it. So from time to time, we come back, we find them, like old family members.

Why I think that tonight, when I could either a) correct such students or b) read a good novel? Because I am amazed at what just happened in a story. Leah. Leah is not an easy story. I try to tell something happened to him, telling how she wanted to die and how it seems to survive. I do not know what will happen yet. She is on the stairs, she falls back wanting, and I do not know if she went to the exit, it will make its survival. But what is strange that she just met Ginny Cooper.

must understand that even if the characters in my book are bound by the events of September 11, 2001, they did not know each other. It's not so crazy: with 45,000 visitors each day, can we really be surprised that about twenty people in two huge towers do not be encountered?

Ginny is just the opposite, it seems to me, Leah. Where Leah look back because she wants to die and wondered why it survives, Ginny, she looks forward resolutely, not to see death and fear. This goal Is Not a morality play. I did not start writing in response to one another, to bring something to light, to make judgments about Leah, or Ginny. And I do not write with a plan in mind, a clear idea of where the characters go, or the collection itself. My friend JSD, he likes the plans. Not me! I feel this way, and it was not until the very end that I know I'm done.

So you understand why, when Leah had not heard the martial determined, Ginny, I jumped. What these two share the descent, these two and not others, Donald, Tilly, Bob this opens a whole series of opportunities that I never even thought of.

Thursday, April 15, 2010

Green Unitard For Men

Leah (3)

She dreams take off his shoes, his socks, his jacket, his bloody ID card which continues to press on its shores. She dreams mostly repeat his morning back up there. She sat at his desk while his colleagues was frightened, calm, composed, repeating to them that followed them here, right now, do not expect me. Jeered the bill a bit, but the smell of smoke, noises on the upper floors, that would suffice for that left alone, after making her promise that she would find the bottom.

The woman before she goes down with an iron determination. Leah envy, thinking to put a hand on her shoulder and ask, naively, as it does to be so confident when the gypsum falls and towers tremble. She hears roughly and find it strange these words into the mouth of a woman in the stairway of a tower in a New York populated by guessing that Leah and sirens television camera.

On rising, morning after the marriage of Eleonora, Leah felt calm. For the first time since May, insomnia had not tortured. She took it for a sign, confirming that his decision was correct. She knew it would take several weeks to turn around in his things, give items, set the paperwork, make sure that nobody discovers incriminating secrets. It was not much to hide. But Leah had always been keen to preserve her privacy. When she laughed again, and Leah think of this as she is guided by the Chieftain before her, Leah said that growing up in a house with no doors and rooms populated by 5 boys had made her the wild it was. Not surprisingly, she recounted, when girl is caught with his pants the first time she really tries to discover what the girls talking at recess.

Tuesday, April 13, 2010

Holographic Will Template Washington State

Leah (2) Leah

The problem, says Leah as she feels behind it the pressure of hundreds of marchers, the problem is that I do not know why I have to rebuild myself. One morning in May, she stood up and everything was complicated. The day before, nothing, no real problem, some financial troubles, a little trouble at all. And then the next morning it was as if the sky had fallen on his head, and she could not get out of bed for two days. Unable to move. Unable to do anything but cry, cry tears that she came from nowhere, who swallowed, choked him. She thought she would die there in his bed on a Saturday in May, while the outside looked like spring to summer. She left the blankets and take over the tears ceased to hold the hoarse cry that shook his body and waited death.

But death did not come. And Leah found momentum, enough to go to the doctor, between bicycles and taxis.

She's better, certainly. Do not spend hours curled up in bed to settle her room and crying sounds she can not recognize. They came from so far. For a few weeks in July, Leah hoped that appeasement announced the end of the vacuum. She wanted to find, look in the mirror without scorn, without seeing the emptiness in her eyes that waved again. But since August, since August 17 in fact, Leah realized that the drug cocktail and the calm smile of his psychologist did hide the fact that big hole that replaces it.

August 17, Leah put on her best dress, the one that always gave him the urge to turn on itself to feel the smoothness and wrinkling of the fabric. The wedding of her friend Eleonora, on a ship, cruising the Hudson River, Leah smiled, while her dress tossed to the wind and the photographer looked into her telling him to settle a bit on the left. She danced, drank a little, ate well. His friends told him she had finally looks better. She nodded, grabbed a glass of champagne. Smiled. It was not a fake smile. But She did not smile for what they all believed.

Leah has never liked to leave things in plan. She came home very late marriage of Eleonora, drunk of sun and sea air. The mind clear, cons, for the first time since that May morning.

Sunday, April 11, 2010

Good Nickname For Angie

and irony

Leah fights. Entangled with the jacket in the bag wedged between the ID card and the wallet it has not had time to put in the right compartment. She also fights with shoes too new and too tight, with the desire to sit there, not to move, to cry or to laugh or to cry. Most importantly, Leah fights with itself. This is not new, this struggle, Leah knows her well, it seems that she has lived since his birth. No, this is nothing new. Except that if the fight is the same, the cause this time is different. And it is with this that Leah is struggling, while its not swallow his shoes, that threatens to empty wallet on the floor, and she wondered why she always keeps advancing. The others, she understands. They want to survive. But she?

Leah came to work at 8.30 specific for what she knew his last day of work. Not only for the company. Tuesday would be her last Tuesday, she had decided to end it. His life was not so sad, if not empty. But it brought him nothing. Leah, since May, feels empty. Neutral. That's the good word: neutral. She wants to cry, scream, yell, she would dream to feel something, something other than silence in it which leaves him no respite. She does not smile even when the sun heats it or face the laughter of a child appears out of nowhere. All summer, she waited, hoping that something woke her. Saw a psychologist. Taken drugs, pills yellow, blue, white, who were bewildered and did not put more than the silence in her muted. Be patient, he said both the doctor that the psychologist. It takes time to rebuild.

The problem, says Leah as she feels behind it the pressure of hundreds of marchers, the problem is that I do not know why I have to rebuild myself.

Wednesday, March 31, 2010

Sharp Pains And 39 Weeks Pregnant

The number sense

September 11 event is inhabited by numbers: about 17,400 people who were in the towers when the attacks, about 15,000 people were evacuated. In the north tower, 1402 people died, including 658 employees of the firm Cantor Fitzgerald here this morning. In the south tower, 614 people died. 18 persons above the point of impact in the south tower had escaped. None in the north tower. In all, counting victims in the planes and Washington, 2819 people died. 77% of victims were male, 23% of women. Between 100 and 200 people would have fallen or jumped from the towers. 289 bodies were found intact in New York. And coroners have to study 19,858 human remains. In the case of 1717 families, there were no remains, no part of body to bury. Even today, 9 years after the attacks, the investigative work on the identity of the victims continues. In addition to two 110-story towers that collapsed in 102 minutes, 5 other buildings collapsed or were demolished because of the extent of damage. The attacks of September 11 have eliminated 124 million square feet of office space.

These numbers are both the landscape and the web 11 September: they refer to the magnitude of the event, human and property destruction. They recall the images seen and reviewed by a cloud of debris, flooding the streets. The weight of numbers is such that sometimes they are held up to stop the questions, doubts and questioned. To compel adherence: to thousands of victims and their family members, what can we really say?

There is also the symbolism of numbers: Is it really necessary to reiterate once again that irony planner that the date of the event which marked a relative failure of the emergency services phone number repeat these same services to the U.S.? Should we remember how the numbers when it comes to the Sept. 11, played an important role in the color given to the event? Now, some numbers can not exist alone, need a subtitle when they talk about something other than that morning in September of this one? Now the numbers are heavy, laden with the memory of the attacks, as if the events had also diverted surely as the planes were.

When it comes to numbers and numbers of 11, nothing seems to be truly free. Or perhaps it would be more accurate to say that the choices made by the creators can not be free, the weight of numbers being as they are full participants in the identity of the event. Fiction raises the question of the truth when negotiating with a historic event: how to tell the real by having enough space to reinvent it? What, facts must be preserved and what can be changed? All, probably. Or maybe not.

Ian Monk, in his poem Twin Towers , works on the principle of enumeration: two columns, recalling the two towers, live on the page. The left column on most things, objects, located in the tower. The right column, it focuses on people, listing the different types of people inhabiting the World Trade Center (male, female, father / mother family, criminal, employee support, etc.). It is inevitable, looking the physical presentation of the poem, not to see the towers. The initial effect would be even more obvious in the version in the book Writing for the OuLiPo where the column widths would be reduced gradually, and where to end the top of one of the towers bend. With the version found online, I could not help but count the lines. Both the English and French versions of the poem of 112 lines. These two lines of "too much" trouble me. What do they mean? The number, too close to reality (110 floors) can not be free. The poet, he decided to add layers of towers? The number is it accidental? Is it really possible, reproducing the shape of the two towers, accidentally add floors?

I do not know. I'm intrigued by the poem, which I find rather interesting. But the numbers of September 11 haunt me, I know too much not to believe in intentionality behind this "error". The poet, he used false information? He looks behind these two stories to send a message?

Friday, March 26, 2010

White Discharge At 39 Weeks Pregnant

Contamination

To think much, spend so much time to think the morning of Sept. 11, perhaps it is inevitable that every airport I visit, each airplane in which I find myself either stained by the events of 2001. This morning, waiting for a flight to Toronto. While I try frantically to finish the lecture that I give in a few hours, a woman comes to sit near the window, like me. She has three children: a daughter in a stroller, two boys under 4 years who settled on the windowsill. The woman is a pro at airports in less than two, she opened the bag of children, and spread the floor a few toys: two books, a Pooh Elmo red a Nintendo, a blanket, etc.. Children are at home in this waiting area near the gate 47 from Dorval Airport. In a few minutes, we will enter all the plane, a Boeing 747 that will lead us in Toronto.

I look at this quiet family, the children well behaved, and I imagine them on the plane over Canada. Overlaps another image: the same children, one mother and me, somewhere along the Hudson River, preparing us to die somewhere in the World Trade Center.

Not that I make the flight anxious. Instead, over time, I become increasingly calm and confident air. I am surprised this morning to pack my bags in less than two, and I spent security checks with an efficiency that is comparable to that of George Clooney in Up in the Air . This is not fear that this happening again. It is, rather, as if I saw us, preparing us for an airliner, as well as those who left Boston a September morning.

Lately, I sometimes dream about the next book, to design her in my sleep subject. I wake up, and I forgot everything. Leaving only the current book, this collection filled with characters some of whom, like me this morning, waiting for their flight in the anonymity of an airport lobby. Contamination, it is this: there can be no question that this tour are those of the World Trade Center. He can currently be no question of an airplane without it that I see allow me to continue to imagine the passengers of four flights on September 11. Perhaps this is because the project'm still whole. Perhaps it is because my reinvention of September 11 is not yet complete.

As for trucks that can no longer, after the death of my brother and my own accident, be innocent, perhaps it is also, finally, that September 11 has confirmed what I already knew: a Once aboard the plane, settled more or less comfortably in those seats, we must make, we give up, and know that no matter what happens, we can do nothing.

Friday, March 5, 2010

Can Gelmicin Cream Be Used On Cat

Time Teaching strategies

I think a lot of new these days. We say that this is another way of not writing. Maybe. Except that I wonder. Since the beginning, I took the party to follow my characters at the heart of September 11, as near as possible. In other words, I do not give them an overall perspective on the event. Not interest me nor war, nor even the reconstruction, at least for the news. The idea was to stick the characters, what they saw, lived, met, to avoid some pitfalls that I spotted among others: the glorification of the characters to begin with, because it seemed that what would each disembodied victims or survivors. In a conference last week, I spotted three processes: the heroism, always because let's be honest, this is the strategy most common among both critics and writers in the tendency to press hard on the incommensurability of the event, as it was impossible to tell, to invent, and the latter strategy, which goes with the other two, which is to exonerate the state, the country, the army, the victims. I thought it was going with the binding of critics and journalists on the blue sky, as if when it's so beautiful, it was impossible for something to happen. "Out of the blue" totally unpredictable. Three strategies, therefore, working the event, give shape, color. And determine the look that you wear, the verdict: victims become martyrs, basically.

I chose with the new, so keep me closer to my characters, to avoid making heroes. I wanted to explore them through the event in its intensity before it really takes shape, before its form, its meaning has been determined, crystallized by the speech. It seemed, and seems always a good idea. Especially through the new form: my texts, very short, after one, two characters in a very precise moment, as fragments of perception as long as they live.

is a question of scale, "said BG after my lecture: the novel, fiction, to an event of this magnitude can not help but to rebuild it by characters, by their point of view. In other words, I might add, it is to see the event with the human, and not from above. Be at the bottom of the towers nearby, and not over in a helicopter could only see because it is too far away to really feel.

What is the problem?
Complex. I Again, this may be a ruse, a way of procrastinating when I feel the end of the project (yes, I finish, if I'm honest, I can only see: the thing forward, surely, is form. There is still work to do, but I do not think I can add another character, another voice, this fresco). I know my tricks for not writing, to torpedo the writing.

The question, cons, is this: am I against time? The code should be published in fall 2011. 10 years after the attacks, my point of view, keeping as close to the "trauma" (I am wary of this word, He directs the play too, he played) that my characters live, does he not against the tide? Should I not suggest anything other than this precise moment in their history, this moment of the event? Am I not, myself, now forcing the event, the trauma, to crystallize, as if there was no life, future after September 11th?

how much I love Siri Hustvedt handles the event in Sorrows of an American : it is there in the horizon of the book, but not central, because all around, life continued, and other tragedies were added to one. The characters, from time to time, turned their gaze to the absence of the towers, then resume their march.

This is not what I do. My characters are, and remain, September 11, 2001. Even those who tell the post are still there. Do not offer an overall picture is there a way to perpetuate forever, the shock of the event? Wanting to avoid the glorification, am I went to throw myself into the lion's den of incommensurability?

Saturday, February 20, 2010

What Can You Do With Burnt Almonds

September 11

"Social Studies School Service" created the "September 11th Education Program": a briefcase containing two DVD and reproducible materials. The goal? of course, provide secondary teachers (grades 6-12) video equipment, photographic and written allowing them to present Sept. 11 to their students. The idea is not bad in itself: of course, must be taught on September 11 for children who, for the most part, were not old enough to understand when it occurred. Of course, we must organize information, provide a perspective on the event, and the best offer different perspectives on issues related to the event.

The DVD includes different elements: a commemorative video of the great events of the day, with excerpts from interviews with survivors, families of victims, and politicians (could it really have made the economy of Giuliani?) and 70 interviews featuring the same survivors, family members, political figures, journalists, etc.. around the time of reconstructing a timeline of the day on September 11 and various topics related to the event, as its commemoration, national security, etc..

It is obvious that the history taught to children can not help but be biased. Or finally, it seems clear that it can not do without the point of view, that the victor in the case of conflict, that of the victim here. From the first video, the view is clear: to be discussed throughout the event to extract the individual level, not the state or the reasons behind the attacks. Of course, I say again, an act of such magnitude can not be justified in any way that would minimize the impact. Certainly. But just as it would in my view incorrect to speak of the rise of Nazism in Europe without mentioning at the same time, Quebec know also his own radicalization, just to show the children that we are not immune from extremism, would it not possible to present the whole event, explaining who were the terrorists? At no time in the multiple segments are we talking about the claims of terrorist groups. Individuals who perpetrated the acts are mentioned, of course, but in passing, and in a way that, again, personalizes the discussion: this is not the group that is designated, it would give an existence, legitimacy . No, these are the "bad guys", the wicked.

If possible to identify, even without consulting the written records, some of the studied objects, such as pros and cons of the various groups opposing the memorial when it comes, the complete absence of a comprehensive perspective on event, a perspective beyond the facts in the 102 minutes of its proceedings, is surprising. Evacuated from this program events preceding the attacks, except for one or two references to the 1993 bombing. No word of what followed the attacks either, outside of what directly concerns the sites (cutting, identification of remains, reconstruction, memorials).

In fact, it is surprising, but not that much. Basically, even if the first moments, appeared on television screens and newspapers printed references to the war, coverage of 11 September was blinded from the start by the notion of victims. Even martyrs. And more often than heroes. The "Portraits of grief" from The Times, directing attention, each time with a story to describe the victim, had undertaken this personalization of the event. And this customization is to create an effect of emotional overload as Susan Sontag fetching every morning his "dose" September 11 by reading the portraits and pouring a few tears. What is overloading? It aims to make visible, to give a face to the thousands of deaths. It is a noble goal, which is difficult to oppose, because the violence of the destruction of 11 September, the violence that has "sprayed" and annihilated those bodies and buildings, just had a depersonalized. But the overload has a perverse effect on the pretext of making visible the victim, sailing event, so instead of seeing both the victim and the act, the act and its context, context and its causes, we only see the face of a man, a woman.

What
said without saying the teaching document, is that nothing and no one could have prevented September 11 and September 11 is unlike any event in history (say the United States, even if speeches go beyond national boundaries). Behind this emotional overload and hides another mechanism of 11 September: hammering the innocence of the victim allows the formation of speech exception, the incommensurability of the event. And it does consider the event that his human part, out of its socio-historical-political. What seems to me rather dangerous.

And this, Jay Winuk, in his commentary on the creation of the 9 / 11 National Day of Service says it very well: merge memory of 11 September with heroism is to ensure that we remember the that Americans are good. The good guys, as opposed to the bad guys of course. It is then, finally, a way to control the memory of the event. And everything is done in most "innocent": "Harness The Memories of 9 / 11 to Help Others in Need,-through charitable acts and public services," offers the documentary at its very end. "Harness". Be positive. Optimistic. And hope that the "harness" here refers more the principle of control, unified broadcast of the event, not the outright exploitation of memory. But which is worse?

Sunday, January 17, 2010

How To Report Disability Fraud In Il

The spectacle of body

When, September 12, 2001, Todd Maisel shall publish front-page photograph of a severed hand, the publisher of Daily News , Ed Kosner is at the center of a controversy: it does not show the body, let alone body parts, many claim. The images of bodies falling or jumping from the towers already face sensitivity newspaper readers also deeply troubled by the attacks. Already, because it is already too much.

The images of September 11, whether television or photographs, were largely censored by the decisions of institutional content publishers but also, through, for political commentary: before the enemy, do not show the bodies. The dismembered bodies, dead, are a sign of weakness, a weakness shameful when it comes time to fight an invisible enemy and protein platform. Maybe. Perhaps, too, Was there not much to show, as said Mary Ann Golon of Time (quoted by David Friend): " Theys Thought, There Had To Be arms and legs and hands. There weren Purpose 't. The FDNY WORKED With The Photographer Who Said The forensics crews WAS destruction so complete There Were Times When You Would Not Even A Whole see gold Whole phone keypad. It Had Turned to Dust. " Very few images of bodies, they are "intact, whole or dismembered therefore have circulated since the attacks of 11 September. One suspects, however, that several photographs were taken, not only the same day but in the weeks and months that followed, during the search for human remains at Ground Zero. Perhaps these pictures for now preserved as much by photographers as "civilians" and firefighters, police and rescue workers, they will re-surface when sufficient time has passed.

I was talking, a few days ago, with DB Both deeply disturbed by the devastation in Haiti following the earthquake of January 12, we used to talk images from Haiti : survivors in shock, injured waiting for care, may not arrive on time. And others who are lying in the streets, the body sometimes barely concealed by a sheet. Most often, a hand, a foot, deformed by fractures, exceed. Why these bodies, called D, are they shown in this way, almost offhandedly, while the bodies of 11 September have been hidden? The fact that the earthquake (like Hurricane Katrina) or a natural disaster he plays in the representation that we give? After all, she suggested, in the case of September 11, an act of war had been committed, show the victims would have been an admission of vulnerability against the enemy.

Maybe. Except that. Except that the images of victims of armed conflicts gleefully circulating the rest of the time. And that these United States, so opposed to the broadcast of images of victims of September 11 did not show less pictures from Iraq or Afghanistan, Palestine or elsewhere.

What causes some victims to be hidden, while others are shown? Newspapers, television reports invaded by body littering the streets of Port-au-Prince, could they turn away from these images that can not help but hurt the Haitian diaspora around the world looking in the pictures finally know for its nationals who survived? Show images, in the case of Haiti, New Orleans, is there a way to cause enough compassion to ensure that the international community act?

And there's another reason, one that is difficult to tackle: September 11, the victims, as a community, came from an America if not easy, at least favored. It was not the case in New Orleans flood victims that followed Katrina were mostly poor. And black. Palestine, Iraq, Afghanistan, Haiti and now: the victims are, for many, the Other. And perhaps it is easier to show the Other in all its vulnerability, its weakness. Perhaps the show he commits to anything. Except for a few false compassion, a little offbeat, which is perhaps another way of perpetuating a remote control, judge people less fortunate than others, less spoiled by life, less protected from danger, just by an accident of birth.

In this reflection, still in its infancy, still troubled by the power of images, impotence help, I can only answer this: to show or not the body responds in a strategy. This strategy, whether humanitarian or political, nevertheless as a way to control the information that the reaction of one who looks at the pictures. And even if its objective, as seems the case now, is right, encourage donations and humanitarian aid, encourage a global response, this does not change the fact that the way to do so, it seems unfair.

Or, more precisely, disrespectful.